Size matters: Influence of center size on quality of diabetes control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes-A longitudinal analysis of the DPV cohort.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes requires experience and a specific infrastructure. Therefore, center size might influence outcome in diabetes treatment. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the influence of center size on the quality of diabetes treatment in children and adolescents in Germany and Austria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2009 and 2018, we analyzed metabolic control, acute complications, and rates of recommended screening tests in the DPV cohort. Diabetes centers were classified according to the number of patients from "XS" to "XL" (<20 [XS], ≥20 to <50 [S], ≥50 to <100 [M], ≥100 to <200 [L], ≥200 [XL]). RESULTS: Over the 10-year period, metabolic control improved significantly in "M", "L" and "XL" diabetes centers. Treatment targets are best achieved in "M" centers, while "XS" centers have the highest mean hemoglobin A1c. The relation between hemoglobin A1c and center size follows a "v-shaped" curve. In 2009, conventional insulin therapy was most frequently used in "XS" centers, but in 2018, there was no difference in mode of insulin therapy according to center size. Use of CSII and sensor augmented CSII/hybrid closed loop increased with center size. Patients cared for in "XS" diabetes centers had the fewest follow-up visits per year. The rates of severe hypoglycemia and DKA were lowest in "XL" diabetes centers, and the rate of DKA was highest in "XS" centers. CONCLUSION: Center size influences quality of care in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Further investigations regarding contributing factors such as staffing and financial resources are required.

Diabetes mellitus in Friedreich Ataxia: A case series of 19 patients from the German-Austrian diabetes mellitus registry.

Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is a multisystem autosomal recessive disease with progressive clinical course involving the neuromuscular and endocrine system. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one typical non-neurological manifestation, caused by beta cell failure and insulin resistance. Because of its rarity, knowledge on DM in FRDA is limited. Based on data from 200,301 patients with DM of the German-Austrian diabetes registry (DPV) and two exemplary patient reports, characteristics of patients with DM and FRDA are compared with classical type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Diabetes phenotype in FRDA is intermediate between type 1 and type 2 diabetes with ketoacidosis being frequent at presentation and blood glucose levels similar to T1Dm but higher than in T2Dm (356 ±â€¯165 and 384 ±â€¯203 mg/dl). 63.2% of FRDA patients received insulin monotherapy, 21% insulin plus oral antidiabetics and 15.8% lifestyle change only, applying similar doses of insulin in all three groups. FRDA patients did not show overweight and HbA1c levels were even lower than in T1Dm or T2Dm patients, respectively, indicating good overall diabetes control. FRDADm can be controlled by individualized treatment regimen with insulin or oral antidiabetics. Patients with DM in FRDA may show a relevant risk to ketoacidotic complications, which should be avoided.